Tony Evans, the football editor of The Times, has launched an extraordinary Twitter rant against Liverpool and James Milner, criticising both the signing itself and what it represents in terms of our owner’s motives.
SEE MORE:
Five players we’d love to poach from former manager Rafael Benitez, following his move to Real Madrid
Liverpool legend rates all of our summer signings out of ten – Lallana gets two points more than Markovic
Liverpool transfer news
The signing of Milner was officially announced by the Reds earlier today, with a medical all that stands in the way of the England international from completing his move to Merseyside at the start of next month.
Evans’ comments – which were spread over the course of 17 increasingly ridiculous Tweets – make several plausible points, such as our less than impressive transfer record under FSG and Brendan Rodgers. However, his argument appears to be otherwise flawed.
For one, he draws the comparison between Milner and Joe Cole, who was also signed on a free contract but failed to make an impact at Anfield. Thankfully, the lack of a transfer fee should be the only similarity. When we signed Cole, he was on the downturn, struggling to retain his place for both Chelsea and England. In contrast, Milner has been a regular for club and country over the last twelve months – so much so that City were prepared to offer a £165,000-per-week deal to keep him (via the Mirror).
Evans suggests that City would have been able to keep him if they truly wanted to, but as has been reported all along, it’s football rather than financial gain that motivates our first new signing of the summer window (via The Telegraph).
He adds that this signing represents the return of short-termism from our owners and goes against Brendan Rodgers’ wishes. He’s wrong on both accounts. As The Telegraph reports, Rodgers has requested marquee signings with experience that can compliment our younger players. Plus, surely even the most simple of individuals can understand the need for us to replace the likes of Steven Gerrard with a player of proven quality.
Evans is essentially attempting to write Milner off before he’s even arrived – despite claiming to ‘like him’ in his opening line. Unlike Evans, we welcome James to Anfield with hopeful expectation – let’s make sure you prove him wrong!
For those that are interested, you can see Evans’ quotes in full below:
I like Milner. But could you imagine him being the highest paid player at any other club with CL ambitions? At any age, never mind 29?
— Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
Most of you are missing point on Milner. He’s good player. But if he went to Arsenal, would he be top earner? Think what it says about LFC — Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
And get over this ‘he cost us nothing’ bullshit. Like Joe Cole cost nothing on 140k a week.
— Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
The signing tells us number of things 1) ‘philosophy’ does not exist. Which is not a bad thing. But it is concern there is no coeherent plan — Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
2) Short-termism is back. They want to get into the CL asap. Probably to make the ‘asset’ more attractive to buyers
— Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
3) there’s a recognition that young teams struggle without leaders. Thought still think 150k per week is expensive for a babbysitter — Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
I’ll try and cut through the hysteria and bellendery for you. 1) FSG are no bad owners. They are not taking money out. They spend income
— Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
2) The money has been spent badly, though. Recruitment process at LFC is flawed at its heart. Too many short cuts. Short cuts rarely work — Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
3) The thought process of owners has changed from a long to medium term plan to short to medium. Sale not imminent but now sooner than later
— Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
4) In eagerness to get things right, Mike Gordon has had more influence on football side of things. I’m all for transferable skills but… — Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
5) The concern is that Rodgers will start season with a squad he doesn’t believe in. Is he pragmatic enough to make it work?
— Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
He did for a spell last season but then it fell apart. — Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
6) Hard to escape belief that seasoned chief exec and better scouting would have put club in better place. But that’s conjecture, I suppose
— Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
7) And last point. Where did scouts come from? Man City. It always bothers me when a club that can outpay you choose not to. Nagging feeling — Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
Sure you don’t want to hear any of this, So for those of you who don’t, he’s the alternative view: EVERYTHING’S GREAT!
— Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
Oh, and another thought for the ‘he’s on a free’ gang. What does Sterling think today? — Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015
You probably don’t care but it makes you think about how resources are being used. Not sure which side of that argument I’d be on, tbh
— Tony Evans (@TonyEvansTimes) June 4, 2015