Ex-PGMOL chief calls for retrospective punishment after what he witnessed at Anfield on Saturday

Posted by
Liverpool and Burnley played out a 1-1 draw at Anfield on Saturday
(Photo by Dan Istitene/Getty Images)

Former PGMOL chief executive Keith Hackett was incensed by one thing he witnessed during Liverpool’s latest Premier League fixture.

The Reds were given a glorious opportunity to take the lead after half an hour against Burnley at Anfield when referee Andy Madley awarded the home side a penalty for a foul by Florentino Luis on Cody Gakpo.

Mike Dean and Michael Dawson on Sky Sports’ Soccer Saturday both felt that the awarding of the spot kick was ‘soft’, and they may have privately been pleased to see Dominik Szoboszlai failing to convert from 12 yards as he struck the crossbar.

Hackett accuses Gakpo of ‘cheating’ on Saturday

Hackett went much further in his condemnation of the decision, accusing the Liverpool forward of a ‘dive’ and calling for retrospective suspensions to be meted out to players who are ‘trying to cheat’.

The ex-PGMOL chief told Football Insider“This is a dive, and not a very good one. No way is this a penalty, and it’s not even a clever one. Next, you really start to question the match official, and what he’s seen, and also what VAR are doing to allow him to get to that decision.

“This was nowhere near a penalty. There are acts of simulation where players are really good, fooling referees, and you need a few replays to rule it out. This is why I’ve said we need a panel on a Monday, with a view to suspensions for players trying to cheat. We all want to win, but let’s win properly.”

Cody Gakpo is caught by Florentino Luis, with Liverpool duly being awarded a penalty
Image via Sky Sports

Gakpo didn’t cheat – there was contact on him

While we admit that Gakpo certainly seemed to exagerrate the level of contact from Florentino, replays show that the Burnley midfielder caught Liverpool’s number 18 with a clumsy challenge, so Madley will likely feel justified in awarding the penalty.

To us, it definitely wasn’t a case of blatant cheating from the Dutchman – it wasn’t as though there was zero contact on him and he was purely trying to con the referee.

Setting that incident aside, we obviously don’t condone out-and-out gamesmanship in football, and we’d hate the thought of anyone in an LFC shirt going out with the intention of cheating to try and get opposition players penalised in the form of penalties or yellow/red cards.

In this tech-savvy era, footballers will know that there are so many cameras and camera angles at the highest level that any blatant cheating will be exposed, and the consequences they face could be severe, not to mention the reputational damage which’d ensue.

You can watch Slot’s full post-Burnley press conference below, via Empire of the Kop on YouTube:

More Stories Cody Gakpo Keith Hackett

5 Comments

  1. I think Mr Hackett needs to get to Specsavers. This was about as clear a penalty as you’ll see all season. Move along, nothing to see here, except for a short-sighted ex-ref seeking clicks.

    1. If the player dived, why did the ref call it a penalty, and why did VAR not call it that way? Let’s leave the calls to the on-field team. They are in the moment, right or wrong.

  2. Mr Hacket with out disrespect you have had your time and it is not the same football you refereed i am sorry to say . You had one ref two assistants a fourth official and two or three VAR referees who all thought it was a penalty so why do you think your observation is correct ? If the incident had happened any where on the pitch you would not even mention it.
    My observation is 99% of referees do not know what a foul is i can touch a player on the shoulder he falls over free kick foul or i grab a player around the neck or waist in penalty area and it is played on .
    If i put all prem refs in separate rooms and showed them videos of the same incident their would be different decisions because they are not on the same page that is the problem you can not have a rule book then leave a decision to what a referee thinks is the right decision either dump rule book or educate the referees.

    1. Where is Mr Hackett when the refs are making bad calls? For example, when Hugo was held onto from the outside the penalty area going into the penalty area and still no foul was given. Just because Hugo did not go down doesn’t mean it’s not a penalty, and when Martinelli threw the ball at Bradley and tried to push him off the pitch, what did Mr Hackett have to say then? Nothing!!!!

  3. Now I see the hatred clearly. Doku dives each time he’s in the 18-yard box and same Hackett is blind and has never seen this. Gakpo was impeded by the leg of the opponent, who never got the ball. Some of these present and former officials are morally bankrupt.

Comments are closed