Daniel Sturridge has the best goals:minute ratio of any striker in Liverpool history.
He’s scored seven goals in 11 starts this term despite being injured pretty much the entire way through it.
Yet many Liverpool fans think PSG’s £45m potential offer is too good to turn down…
Here’s the debate online.
Which side of it do you stand?
If we get offered £45m for Sturridge then I think we should probably take it. #lfc
— The Anfield Chat (@TheAnfieldChat) March 24, 2016
I’m not entirely opposed to selling Sturridge. But selling him without a replacement lined up would be a mistake. #LFC
— Stateside Kop (@StatesideKop) March 24, 2016
Get excited about Sturridge getting sold for 50 mill because now we actually have a decent manager who will use the money well #LFC
— C (@Crissy_Lad) March 24, 2016
50mil for sturridge. Thats his price if you want him. Take it or leave it.
— Liam McCully (@LiamMcCully) March 24, 2016
— The Woodster™ (@DavidJEWood) March 24, 2016
Liverpool will be the greatest club of all time if they get £50m for Sturridge, overtaking Chelsea for getting £50m for David Luiz
— Conte, yeah? (@HipstersChoice) March 24, 2016
I would loathe to see Sturridge go. There’s no way we could get an immediate replacement with his quality without paying more than £50m.
— Lfc Insights (@lfcInsights) March 24, 2016
Baffled by the people who think we should sell Sturridge or Lovren. Studge is our best player and Lovren has been solid recently. #LFC
— BradLFC (@BradLFC_) March 24, 2016
— Liverpool FC (@LFCblogster) March 24, 2016
We keep selling our world class players, like Sturridge and think we can replace them.
In most cases we haven’t or can’t #LFC
— Anything Liverpool (@Anything_LFC) March 24, 2016
To think even the £45 mil Sturridge money could move Aubameyang from 2nd place Germany to 6/7th England? Keep Sturridge. I’d splash on a GK
— Nature Boy (@JoshFeeneyLFC97) March 24, 2016